We already fought and 'mostly' won this battle once. There's a reason chazerei like Frontpage and Dreamweaver has gone the way of the dodo amongst QUALIFIED developers, and the few newer programs that try to fill their shoes are just as flawed. Simply put, WYSIWYG's / visual design CANNOT maintain a proper separation of presentation from content and they certainly DO NOT produce semantic markup. This flips the bird at all non screen-media users including those using screen readers (software that reads the page aloud), braille readers, and of course search engines. Since as the joke goes, search engines don't have eyeballs and they sure as shine-ola don't care about your layout. Such "Visual design" tools have not one blasted thing to do with ACTUAL design, since they are by their very nature about visuals and layout, and not the underlying specifications, requirements, or accessibility norms that separate art from design. They are a crutch for those who cry "wah wah, I don't wanna learn" and the sites that result ALWAYS do more harm than good. and that's just the concept of the editor.
THEN you have that they rely on dumbass framework TRASH like bootcrap. Where separation of presentation from content and logical semantics is pissed on from so on-high you'd think the almighty just got back from a kegger!Īs I'm always saying about HTML/CSS frameworks is that those CREATING them have so spectacularly failed to divine the purpose of HTML, what 4 Strict was trying to drag us towards, and why CSS is a separate specification that it becomes clear not ONE of the lot is qualified to write a single line of HTML.
0 kommentar(er)
